Why do Korean children bully Japanese children?



Press Release

19 December 2016


Why do Korean children bully Japanese children?



Some journalists asked me if I would agree that the comfort woman statue itself could cause no harm.   Unfortunately the innocent looking girl is designed to be the symbol of Korean anti-Japan sentiment.  Her extremely young appearance is to suggest that such a young child was used as a sex slave by the Japanese military.  Korean teachers take their young students to the statue and teach them their version of the history.



As a result of the anti-Japan education, not only in South Korea but also in other countries, young Korean children grow up believing the comfort woman abduction story, and their anti-Japan behaviour is often encouraged and praised by their teachers and parents as you can see in this picture taken at a train station in South Korea.





Here is another example of such children. They created a YouTube movie which includes a scene of a Japanese soldier, acted by a Korean student, killing a comfort woman, acted by another Korean student, by stabbing followed by a close shot of a hand with pouring blood.







https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uicdRsUoD6s




Sydney Lee (리나), Jino Chung (진오), Simone Willets (앵두), Noah Wise (다현), Sebastian Chai (세비), Devin Dunnigan (데빈)


This kind of story is no longer believed in Japan as the Asahi Newspaper, which disseminated the fabricated abduction story originally, admitted it was a fictitious story created by a con man called Seiji Yoshida.   But the story remains in Korean children's mind due to the anti-Japan education prevailing in Korean societies and they instinctively spit at Japanese counterparts and demand them to apologize.   Now Japanese people have begun experiencing similar bullying and intimidation in Australia since the comfort women statue became an issue here and this is what the local mothers are worried about.



This is the fundamental difference between ANZAC monuments and comfort woman statues.   Australian children learning history are never taught to hate former enemy countries and their descendants.  Unfortunately this is not the case with the comfort women statues, and so we are forced to defend our families from this kind of racial intimidation as best we can.



Accordingly it is impossible for us to consider the comfort woman statue as a statue that symbolises all women who suffered in war as Rev Crews insists.  The statue is never free from the intention and the motivation of the people who created and erected it.  The plaques that accompany the statue clearly accuse only the Japanese during World War II and there is no mention of the suffering of any other people forced into prostitution during wars, including for example comfort women during the Korean War and Vietnamese War under the South Korean government’s own military prostitution programme.  It is always important to learn from the past but we have to teach our children to positively construct the future as well.



This is not about dispute over historical facts.  Everyone can have his/her own view.  Yet we must refrain from threatening and adversely affecting other ethnic communities.  There are many cross cultural families in Australia. They are all worried about the safety of their children.



We would like the Uniting Church to rewrite the plaques according to what Rev Crews says himself and house the statue somewhere inside, more private and discreet to minimize the risk of adversely affecting the local communities.  Korean people can visit the statue commemorating women suffered in war in peace without offensive demonstrations.  This is rather a simple and reasonable request.



If you wish to further investigate this issue, please read the articles below:

“Comfort women articles by scholars “
http://scholarsinenglish.blogspot.com.au/2014/10/the-comfort-women-by-chunghee-sarah-soh.html





Tetsuhide Yamaoka



President

Australia-Japan Community Network








Comfort Woman Statue causing racial bullying to Japanese children


Media Release

15 December 2016 


Comfort Woman Statue causing racial bullying to Japanese children 


We release this statement to further clarify our position on this matter.

We received a couple of emails accusing us of using the 18C to challenge the historical facts and whitewash atrocities.  We restate the following.

War ended a long time ago.  Everything was legally settled and we moved on.  Everybody can have own views and interpretation over historical events.  We should be sensitive towards any traumas people carry on.  However we must make sure our local communities are kept in harmony.  We should refrain from using history to achieve political goals.  We stress again that young children are far more susceptible to racial hatred.

We hear from worried and distressed parents especially from North America where such statues were already erected and political demonstrations continuously take place.

Typical cases:

• Korean children surround a Japanese child and force him/her to apologize.
• Korean children spit at Japanese children and/or spit over lunch boxes of Japanese children.
• Korean children tell Japanese children “Japanese are evil race.”

Those Korean children think it is OK to do so watching what their parents say and do.


One case from Strathfield, NSW in 2015.

A Korean boy told his Japanese best friend “Let’s stay friends no matter what adults say and do.”


Another case in Sydney CBD

A Japanese mother visited a Korean own Japanese restaurant in Sydney CBD. Her half Australian daughter was served a boiling water in a cup with a straw.  As she burnt her throat and started crying the mother asked workers at the restaurant to give her water but she was ignored for a long time and she had to push very hard.


We must not allow this to happen in our local communities and we explained this in detail to the Uniting Church asking their cooperation but they did nothing merely saying “The statue is not targeting the Japanese.”  Such an attitude is totally irresponsible and we consider it culpable being a religious organization supposed to work for everyone’s welfare.

Accordingly we are forced to take a formal action.  It is a basic instinct of parents to protect their children.  AJCN is committed to support them.  We can always talk about historical interpretations but that is a separate matter.  Hence 18C is considered relevant in this case.  Please also refer to the attached bullying cases reported by a Japanese scholar who visited local Japanese parents in North America.


Best regards
Tetsuhide Yamaoka
President
Australia-Japan Community Network



About the Comfort Woman Statue

Media Release
14 December 2016

About the Comfort Woman Statue



As ABC reported AJCN has lodged a complaint against Uniting Church Australia at Human Right Commission.

Completely apart from interpretation of historical facts we have a numerous number of reasons to believe this statue has been promoted as a political tool causing unnecessary animosity and division to local communities. For this reason, Strathfield Council unanimously declined the Korean proposal in 2015 as more than 70% of residents voted No to the statue. More recently, Friedburg in Germany declined the similar proposal having realised that the statue is used as a political tool to put pressure on the Japanese government.
This kind of statues have been erected all over the world, and demonstrations taking place beside the statues are clearly political, racial and often violent. We consider this is a huge intimidation to the Japanese nationals. Please see the photos below for your references. What further concerns us is the fact that those specific Korean people promoting the statue are trying to break the governmental mutual agreement proposed by both Japanese and the South Korean governments. This agreement is implemented with the aim to provide assistance to the families of deceased comfort women and surviving comfort women, and Australian government officially announced that they also support this agreement as well. We hardly understand why we cannot let the two governments settle and build a better relationship for the future. This statue is a clear symbol with the intention of disregarding the governmental agreement.

Mr Abe beheaded beside the statue. Photography taken in South Korea

One of the ceremonies held in the U.S. to promote the “comfort women” statue.
Another point is that, we realised young children are naturally susceptible to racial hatred. We are deeply shocked by the fact that small children in South Korea are educated that Japan is an evil at a very young age in their Anti-Japan education system. The following photos are showing drawings by young Korean children which were displayed at a subway station outside Seoul.


We are frightened to see this kind of hatred has been publically displayed at the place of train station.

 


 These are placards held up by Korean and Chinese supporters at Strathfield extraordinary council meeting on 11th August 2015. These placards clearly indicate that this issue is far beyond peaceful, but strongly political.

Because of the factors described above, the comfort woman statue has never been a peaceful monument. It can easily trigger racial hatred and provoke discrimination especially amongst young children and student. In 2014, parents who are concerned with particular bullying and hatred their children experienced have sent a letter to Prime Minister Abe asking for a help. This happened in North America and we can easily assume this can happen in Australia, and this is the reason we have been objecting to the erection of statue since 2014. We must avoid it by all means.

In last 6 months we have been explaining these in detail to Rev Bill Crews and the Uniting Church at numerous occasions, however, so far our concerns have been flatly ignored. Hence we are forced to take a more formal action.

What Rev Crews publicly stated also hightens our fear. In a video Korean group submitted online, he appeared and said that he wants to erect the statue facing the public roads to make “perpetrators apologise.” We believe there are no perpetrators in Ashfield in regards to this issue and we are deeply shocked by being called “perpetrators”.

Later Rev Crews changed his words and stated in public that this statue was “representing not only comfort women but also all the women suffered in war, and even those women suffering domestic violence in today’s society.” We see this as an extremely deceptive and misleading act because the plaques attached to the statue are specifically blaming only Japan. This is clearly a form of racial discrimination by singling out the Japanese race.

The comfort woman issue and suffering of women in war is a universal issue that we should all seriously consider about it. However, it does not make sense if today’s mothers and children are subjected to racial hatred and discrimination because of such statue to honor women. Please let us say that we are only working for local parents who have been sensing tension and animosity since this matter was raised by the Korean group in 2014. We respect freedom of speech and thoughts, but we are also committed to protect our children and also maintain our local community harmony. This is the only thing what we are pursuing.

We would like the statue to be kept somewhere private and discreet so that people who are interested can visit but still we can minimise the risk of causing unnecessary harm to the local community which we should value the most. This should be a fair request.

Our message to fellow Australians is;
The world is increasing complex and turbulent. Our challenge is how to avoid importing foreign conflicts into Australia. For that purpose, the key is we put our community harmony first, not last.

I hope this media release help you understand where we stand. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions.



Best regards
Tetsuhide Yamaoka
President
Australia-Japan Community Network



Media Release : Unveiling Ceremony of Comfort Woman Statue


Media Release

7 August 2016


Unveiling Ceremony of Comfort Woman Statue




It is regrettable that the Korean group disobeyed the conditions set by the council for the last minute approval of the unveiling ceremony. They used the car park and put offensive banners as many as they wanted while banners were banned. This is the typical nature of such a ceremony.

Having watched the ceremony and interviewed by media we realized we were facing the stereotype labelling.

1. Opposing statue means denying the history and women’s suffering.
2. Erecting statue means supporting women’s human right.

80% of the members of AJCN are mothers with children. They were deeply concerned with the aggression posed by the Korean group knowing Japanese children were subject to discrimination and bullying in the U.S. where such statues had been erected.

We heard of many stories such as Korean students are insulting Japanese students by calling them “rapists” and spitting over Japanese students’ lunch box. When Japanese mothers complain to the school their children are further bullied for revenge. A Japanese lady who opposed such a statue in her town received a letter from a Korean man saying “If you were not an old woman I would beat you up.” She had to report to police. This case will be heard in court. We also have received a couple of similar emails full of anger and hatred all ending with “I am disgusted with you.”
These are the common dark characteristic of statue supporters. (We also received supportive emails from Korean people)

Needless to say, it is always important to pay tribute to women who suffered in war. But it is also important to protect human right of women and children living now. That is why we founded AJCN and many Australian husbands joined to protect their Japanese wives and half Japanese children. This is what we are. Our slogan is “Harmony must come first”. Strathfield Council fully supported our idea and unanimously declined the proposal to erect a statue by the same Korean people.

It is hard to comprehend that those Korean people are aggressively demanding apology while they are opposing the governmental agreement. If you are genuinely concerned with women’s welfare you would support the agreement to move on. The Australian government is officially supporting the agreement. However there is no surprise because the group called Chon Dae Hyup based in Seoul erecting such statues all over the world and driving this move in Sydney is the one who opposed the past reconciliation efforts as well.

About twenty years ago the Japanese government established Asian Women’s Fund. They paid individual former comfort women and personally handed a Prime Minister’s apology letter. Yet Chon Dae Hyup pressured women not to receive money and insulted those women who received money as betrayer. Their persistent destructive behavior finally stalled the reconciliation efforts. This new agreement is making sure to succeed with the full commitment of the South Korean government. But they are trying to destroy again by erecting statues and holding such ceremonies full of accusation. Who do you think is benefiting from conflicts between Japan and South Korea? Why do they need to erect that many statues to commemorate women’s suffering? Do they really care about women’s human right after all?

We propose to honor women of all nationalities. We should not forget the Korean women treated as military supply by the South Korean government and Vietnamese women raped and slaughtered by South Korean troops. We should not forget the fact that the majority of comfort women were Japanese who never asked compensation. The Japanese government should compensate them as well. The Japanese government was forced to establish comfort stations for occupying soldiers as thousands of rape incidents were reported in the first month or two of the occupation after the WWII. We must not forget women living now, either. We should rescue those numerous number of young Korean prostitutes trafficked by Korean brokers deeply soaked in debt. We did point these out to the Korean Society but we received no reply.

Rev Bill Crew’s comment “"We are singling out those Japanese people that offended, we are not singling out Japanese people as a whole." is utterly nonsensical. Then why does he need to erect a statue in Ashfield? Isn’t it more relevant to erect a statue of all the young children sexually abused by Uniting Church Australia if they had paid 2 million dollars for compensation? Only the one who has never sinned should throw a stone.

We explained our concerns in full detail to Rev Crews but he never addressed them. He replied only once when we asked him how he was addressing the South Korean government’s own comfort woman system. He just said “I think all governments are bad.”

We do have a very serious reason to oppose the statue but it appears that neither the Korean group nor Rev Crews is prepared for a rational discussion. If they were genuinely working for women’s human right they would also reflect on their own acts and would not intimidate other ethnic groups in a third country. Having seen the ceremony and listened to their speeches we are convinced that the statue is a symbol of hatred and a tool of the people who need a conflict for their own political purpose and existence.

We seek a genuine sympathy and compassion to all the women who suffered in war. We must work towards reconciliation rather than endless accusation. We must work together to rescue women living now. Therefore we do not approve the statue and the superficial labelling. If we allow importing foreign disputes into local communities Australian multiculturalism will easily fall apart.

Tesshu Yamaoka
President
Australia-Japan Community Network




About the Comfort Woman Statue


Media Release
4 August 2016


About the Comfort Woman Statue


Last year Strathfield Council unanimously declined the proposal to erect a comfort woman statue with a genuine reason.  The statue was not only breaching council policy but also unwanted by the majority of the community simply because it was only dividing the community while the matter was totally unrelated to the community.  We should respect the decision.  One of the councilors who voted against said at the end of the extraordinary meeting in which the decision was made "Go home as Australian".  That is the spirit we represent. 

We have been deeply shocked by the fact that Rev Crews of Uniting Church Ashfield suddenly appeared over the Internet is publicly calling the Japanese “perpetrators” and demanding apology in public.  He does not explain why he is then supporting the Korean group trying to jeopardize the governmental agreement between Japan & South Korea to formally settle the matter.  It appears a sheer contradiction to us.  Rev Crews declared that he is going to erect the comfort woman statue on his church grounds facing the public road to pressure “perpetrators” to apologize.  Obviously he considers the local Japanese community “perpetrators”.  He also commented “It is dividing the community anyway, so just apologize.”  This is far more than just “honoring comfort women” and this is the clear evidence that the statue always comes with hatred and aggression.  It is extremely unfair for the Japanese community having to face this kind of one-sided intimidation while the matter has got nothing to do with the local community where we have been living in harmony with all other ethnic groups. It is in addition a breach of the Racial Discrimination Laws of Australia.

The Korean group has been running anti-Japan campaigns across Sydney.  They are driven by a political activist group based in Seoul sharply confronting their own government by trying to jeopardize the governmental agreement that Australian government also supports.  This is clearly a politically motivated activity rather than a pure commemoration.  It is also a contradiction that they demand apology while they try to boycott the governmental agreement by running anti-Japan campaigns.  Most former comfort women are welcoming the agreement and only some women under the activist group’s influence are opposing as they always do.   The Korean group does not seem to care the proven fact that the South Korean government was running their own comfort woman system during the Korean War and Vietnam War and still refusing to apologize to both Korean and Vietnamese women who were brutalized by South Korean soldiers.  The Japanese government offered apology many times. It is pointless and even hypocritical to one-sidedly blame others without reflecting on their own acts.   We should not discriminate women who suffered in war.  

Accordingly we do not consider the statue a “peace monument”, particularly in view of the aggressive language accompanying the discussion.  We are a group of mums and dads determined to protect our local community and our children from any racially agitated discrimination that already happened overseas where such statues were erected.  We can always talk about history but community harmony must come first. 

We request Rev Bill Crews immediately stop his irrelevant intimidation of the local Japanese community and simply support the efforts of the two governments trying to finally settle the sensitive matter.  There are many Uniting Church members opposing his acts and we do not understand why he is ignoring them.  We wish to avoid any further conflict by way of litigation and so we also urge the Korean Society of Sydney to peacefully hold whatever ceremony on Saturday inside their premises leased from the Council without any aggression and/or intimidation towards other ethnic groups and follow a number of conditions and the guide not to display the statue in public view even inside the building given by the Canterbury-Bankstown Council.  We all respect freedom of speech but at the same time we respect the Anti-Discrimination laws of Australia and we are responsible to maintain and protect community harmony that is the essential element of Australian multiculturalism. 

Lastly we express our appreciation for the efforts of the Council and in particular their letter to our lawyer Rick Mitry dated today in which conditions require activities in relation to the Statue to be discreet and say ‘Council has, is, and will always remain committed to all sections of our community without favour’. 

Tesshu Yamaoka
President, Australia-Japan Community Network


A scene of an unveiling ceremony in California

Placards carried by Korean activists





Dear Korean students in Australia, no violence please!


Dear Korean students protesting the governmental agreement over the comfort woman issue,

We know you posted a movie of your counterparts violently protesting the governmental agreement in Seoul.
We respect your freedom of speech but please refrain from violence.  You must know that most ex-comfort women have welcomed the efforts made by both the governments.  Only those under Chon Dae Hyup control are protesting as they always do anyway.

The historical facts are very different from what you were taught at school.  If you are doing it out of your passion & sympathy please get your own government to apologize to those Vietnamese women sexually assaulted by South Korean soldiers as well.

Most importantly, please don't import your aggressive behavior to Australia.  We are unrelated to the issue and living in peace with all other ethnic groups.  You have no right to disturb our life here.   If you cannot contain your anger please stay in Korea and help those ladies there if you really want to. This is where all the different races live together in harmony under the Australian customs and values.  We must not import foreign conflicts into this country we call home.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Joe3T8nqmQA






Best regards
Yamaoka
President, Australia-Japan Community Network





Why Has South Korea Still Not Apologized to the Vietnamese Comfort Women?


From the web site : examiner.com




This year, at the 96th anniversary of the Korean uprising against Japan in March 1, 1919, South
Korean President Park Geun-hye reiterated her call for Japan to admit to the war crimes it had
committed during World War Two. Yet, even as she relentlessly seeks an apology from Japan, Ms.
Park has conveniently ignored the fact that during the Vietnam War, Korean troops raped,
assaulted and barbarically slaughtered thousands of Vietnam comfort women. Ms. Park cannot
escape blame and claim unverified reports. Why South Korea still refuses to apologize to the
Vietnam comfort women is not as mysterious as it seems.

Documents from the US National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) show irrefutable
proof of South Korea’s abuses and wrongdoings during that period. Noriyuki Yamaguchi, then
Washington bureau chief of the Tokyo Broadcasting System, mentioned in an article he wrote that
in July 2014, the archives revealed a letter from the US military command stationed in Ho Chi Minh
City (then Saigon) to Gen. Chae Myeong-sin, the military commander of South Korea in Vietnam.
The letter referred to the illegal diversion of US supplies to South Korea, acts of prostitution in a
supposedly “welfare center” where Vietnamese women were working, and US troops using that
center for a $38 fee per visit.

The above report is only one of many accounts of South Korea’s atrocities towards the
Vietnamese people during the war. Elderly survivors have recounted their own horror stories of
the sex slavery and massacres they went through at that time. In 2001, recognizing the veracity of
the reports, then South Korean President Kim Dae-jung met with Vietnam President Tran Duc
Luong and offered a direct apology for South Korea’s acts on the Vietnamese people during the
war.

But the day after Kim’s message of apology, Park Gein-hye, then deputy leader of the Grand
National Party, the opposition party at the time, criticized Kim’s statement, saying it “drove a stake
through the honor of South Korea.” Looking back, it was an omen of things to come if she should
lead the country someday.

Seventy years and several apologies later, South Korean officials are still pressing Japan over the
WW2 comfort women issue. Like an infant fixated on a vendetta, South Korea’s sense of
entitlement is such that no amount of compensation or apology will satisfy them. Or is it really a
simple case of overblown egomania? Old and new historical events might provide clues.

In a case of karmic retribution for South Korea, the Vietnam comfort women issue has been
brought to international awareness 40 years after the war ended. To recall, in 1991 Kim Hak-soon
was the first Korean comfort woman living in South Korea to give a testimony about her alleged
experience under the control of Japanese soldiers. It triggered a barrage of angry reactions
against Japan and put the country under scrutiny for the reparation and atonement it should give
to its victims. Now it is South Korea facing the very same situation. Long before the Vietnam
comfort women came out and identified themselves, they already knew about their own
atrocities but, through cunning and clever manipulation, managed to keep it under the radar of the
mainstream media.

It took a visit to Vietnam by Yoon Mi-hyang in March to uncover the grim truth about the sex
enslavement of Vietnam’s women by Korean and American troops. Yoon is president of the Korean
Council for the Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery by Japan, the non-profit organization
formed to look into alleged crimes against women in Asia during World War Two, many of whom
were Koreans. In 2012, the Council had set up the Butterfly Fund and extended their mission to
help other women victims of war. Congo was the first country they identified. Little did they know
that in Vietnam, they would find out about the horrors that their own countrymen, the Korean
soldiers, had perpetrated.

Another recent incident that has put Pres. Park in a negative light is the Sewol ferry disaster. On
April 16, 2014, the South Korean ferry Sewol, carrying 476 passengers and crew, among them 325
high school students, was on its way from Incheon to Jeju island when it sank, killing more than
300 people, mostly the students. To date, nine are still missing. It was rumored that Pres. Park was
nowhere to be found and she was with a former political aide said to be married then. Japanese
journalist Tatsuya Kato, chief of Sankei Shimbun’s Seoul bureau, was singled out for printing this
piece of information and defaming Ms. Park. He was charged and indicted. This incident has
raised howls from international journalists amid concerns on press freedom in South Korea.

Park’s handling of the Sewol ferry disaster was widely criticized. In the seven hours leading to the
disaster, she received 18 reports and her only response were two orders that were standard
operating procedures. It was the committee secretary who acted as spokesperson before Ms.
Park could face the public herself. The investigation into the botched rescue efforts, the cause of
the sinking and the violation of safety rules have been assailed by the victims’ families as being
controlled by Park’s government. Add to that her unfulfilled promise to raise the ferry from the
bottom of the sea. At the first anniversary of the sinking, the families refused to meet the president
and promised to stage regular protests.

Park’s Strategy to Gain Support and Popularity

Recent polls show Park’s public support dropping from a low of 29% to a high of 46% from the preaccident
70 percent. In her bid to regain her popularity in the local and international community,
she must portray her nation as a victim. And the most convenient issue is a social one that targets
the “bleeding hearts” of open wounds from WW2 and stoke up nationalism via anti-Japan rhetoric
and propaganda. Here, the Korean comfort women fit the bill. Certainly, Japan has owned up to its’
share of the blame when it comes to WWS war crimes. From 1965 to 2010, its Ministers, Cabinet
officials and most significantly Emperors have made at least 14 apologies to South Korea alone, not
counting the 1995 Murayama and 1993 Kono statements. It put up the Asian Women’s Fund to give
monetary compensation to the comfort women in various countries, which all accepted but South
Korea refused to accept. On the domestic front, Park has been successful. Polls show that 57.4% of
respondents support not holding summit talks with Tokyo until yet another full apology from Japan
is given. In the United States, officials and diplomats are divided. Dr. Robert L. Shapiro, a former
adviser on economic affairs, sent a video message to Pres. Park stating his concern over her
country’s failure to forge better ties with Japan and her government’s curtailment of press
freedom. Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, Wendy R. Sherman was more direct, citing
Park’s desire for cheap applause by putting Japan in a bad light for propaganda’s sake alone.

Another controversial issue between South Korea and Japan is over the Liancourt Rocks. Known
as Dokdo in Korea and Takeshima in Japan, the two countries have been disputing the territorial
jurisdiction of the islands, composed of two main islets and 35 smaller rocks. These islets are
valued for their rich fishing grounds and production of natural gas.

The background behind ownership of these islands is confusing. South Korea has been
administering them since 1954 but Japan’s legal basis of possession dates back to 1904. To put an
end to the dispute, Japan has suggested three times (in 1954, 1962 and 2012) that the matter be
taken to the International Court of Justice, but this was rejected by South Korea each time.

South Korea hopes that the US will back them in this matter and an opinion post in the Korea
Herald recently criticized its’ own government’s futile brinkmanship. Political analysts are not
inclined to think this will lead to any serious actions, militarily speaking or that the US will take
sides. Both Japan and South Korea are powerful Asian allies of the United States and showing
favoritism would be detrimental to it’s position. But Park Hwee-rhak, a political science professor at
Kookmin University in Seoul says Japan is more important to America in its policy towards Asia
because of its economic power, military technologies and its capacity to keep China in check over
its ambitious expansion plans.

Comfort Women Memorials and Resolutions Spring Up in the US

Some US politicians have been quick to cash in on the comfort women issue. When House
Resolution 121 sponsored by Rep. Michael Honda of Silicon Valley, Calif., was passed in 2007, it
was a go-signal for politicians to cater to the wishes of the South Korean community in their
electoral areas. In the guise of advancing public awareness to the injustice done to South Korean
women, resolutions and statues of comfort women have been put up in cities around the United
States. Local Korean-American organizations in the area applied pressure on officials to yield.
These particular “voting areas” have a large community of Korean-Americans who can swing votes
when elections come around.

On August 2014, the Fullerton City Council approved a resolution recognizing the Korean comfort
women. In New Jersey, the State Senate passed a resolution to the same effect.

The first comfort woman monument in the US was put up in Palisades Park, NJ in 2010. In 2012,
another one was erected in Veterans Memorial in Eisenhower Park, Nassau County, NY. In March
2013, a memorial was opened in Hackensack’s Bergen County, NJ and in July 2013, in Glendale
Central Park, Glendale, Calif., a statue of a young girl representing a comfort woman was unveiled.
In August 2014, a statue was put up in Southfield, Michigan. There are plans for another statue to
be put up in Maryland.

The comfort women monuments binge-building has recently spread to Canada, with a well know
political blogger calling it “a giant scam whose goal is to alienate Japan from the Western powers.”
The City of Burnaby in British Columbia is in the process of studying a proposal to put up a comfort
woman statue in the city.

With the Vietnam comfort women coming out into public consciousness, can the US expect a
deluge of similar memorials installed in the cities and parks anytime soon? And will South Korea
protest against them as the Japanese did over the Korean comfort women monuments? The truth
is that they won’t, as the Vietnamese communities in the US hold far less political sway and the US
itself would rather forget the Vietnam War.

The Atrocities in the Vietnam War

Just as the Japanese had their Comfort Women, South Korea also created brothels with Vietnam
comfort women for their and the American troops’ carnal pleasure. Numbering 5,000 to 30,000,
stories about them are not easy to come by, thanks to the cloud of secrecy that South Korea
shrouded them with.

The massacres that the Korean military committed during the Vietnam War on the Vietnamese
took about 9000 lives, not counting the living survivors who had no more lives to speak of. From
that time until 2000 when a more liberal administration took over in South Korea, it was taboo to
talk about their participation in the war. In June 2002, the US National Archives and Records
Administration declassified documents about the Vietnam War and the massacres at Phong Nhi
and Phong Nhat, Hoan Chau, and Phuoc My were made public. There are also the 1966
massacres at Tay Vinh that saw 1200 civilians being slaughtered and at Go Dai with 380 people
rounded up and killed. These mass slayings were all done in the same manner. The Ha My
account is an example of the way the South Korean Army and Marines butchered and killed
innocent men, women and children without remorse.

A first-hand account from Pamtihoa, survivor of the Ha My massacre is reprinted in The Hankyoreh.
It shows the trickery and brutality of the South Korean soldiers towards the Vietnamese. In March
1965, the 3rd US Marine amphibious force landed in Da Nang, Vietnam and took over Ho Ah Bang
and Di En Ban. In December 1967, the 5th regiment of the USMC handed over the Con Ninh base
to the 2nd Marine brigade of South Korea, called the Blue Dragons.

The people of Ha My who had been transferred to Con Ninh base went back to their village, as life
was hard at the base. Whether the Korean Marines permitted them or not is not clear. But they did
provide the village people with food and supplies and the villagers returned the favor by giving
them local delicacies. But, to their horror a month later, the nice Korean soldiers turned into
monsters. It was on a morning that they came, entered the village with their tanks and armored
vehicles and moved in three different directions. Then they gathered the villagers in three different
locations to listen to a speech from the Korean commander while the soldiers gave candies to the
children.

After the speech, the commander walked away and, after a few steps, made a hand gesture. In an
instant, M60 machine guns and grenade launchers came out of hiding from the woods and
opened fire on the shocked villagers. A total of 135 people were killed. Pamhitoa survived but lost
both feet. The dead were a ghastly sight – brains coming out of head, internal organs spilling out
of bodies, decapitated limbs. Along with a few survivors, Pamhitoa buried the dead in shallow
holes they had dug up. But the next day, the Korean soldiers returned with D-7 bulldozers, dug up
the graves and crushed all the dead bodies.

The Vietnam Comfort Women’s Stories

Unlike South Korea under Pres. Park, the Vietnam government advises its citizenry to put the past
behind them and move on to the future. But, if only to make Ms. Park realize her inconsistency and
how the resolution of war issues lies in her own hands, the Vietnam comfort women must be made
known in the same manner as the Koreans want their stories to be shared. Surviving Vietnamese
women speak of serial rapes several times a day, brutal sexual assaults and killing them after the
rapes. One woman who was nine months pregnant had her stomach slit open and her entrails
along with her baby hanging out.

Korean comfort women survivors Kim Bok-dong and Gil Won-ok as well as the Korean Council for
the Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery by Japan have called on the South Korean
government to acknowledge the country’s wrongdoings and atone for them by way of an official
apology and compensation. It was an emotional moment and an eye opener at the House of
Sharing last April when Yoo Hee-nam, a comfort woman for the Japanese Army met with Nguyen
Tan Lan (64) and Nguyen Thi Thanh (55), massacre survivors.

What makes the Vietnam comfort women issue worse are the consequences of the rapes are the
children born out of these barbaric acts- called the Lai Dai Han, a term for mixed blooded children
who are viewed as contemptible and shunned by society. There are about 5,000 to 30,000 of
them, unacknowledged by their Korean fathers.

In fairness, Korean soldiers were not alone in raping the Vietnamese women. From August 1964 to
May 7, 1975, there were more than 9 million military men who served in the Vietnam War. Accounts
and research have proven that American GIs also participated in the rapes. But they were kept
hidden and if they did reach army court-martial trials, convictions were few and sentences were
light. The US government cannot deny that it shares accountability for the war crimes in the
Vietnam War along with South Korea. While the official stand is always not to condone such acts,
it’s a different matter out in the battlefields. Commanders and generals turn a blind eye to the truth.
But the war ended decades ago and the time has come for both countries to face their
responsibilities and cease the hypocritical finger pointing at Japan.